mcp server
ContrastAPI
55 tools, 7 Resources, Sigma rules, email SPF/DMARC, MITRE, CVE/KEV, risk_score. No key.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.36.0
- active
- security
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-08-04. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 32 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-08-04 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 5 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 1.36.0 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-08-02 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-08-02 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
io.github.CSOAI-ORG/mitre-atlas-mcp
— last commit 2026-06-26, shares ai-security, mitre-atlas, security
MITRE ATLAS — Adversarial Threat Landscape for AI Systems. Tactics + techniques for attacking AI...
-
io.github.BurtTheCoder/shodan
— last commit 2026-03-31, shares cve, cybersecurity, osint
MCP server for Shodan API — device search, IP lookup, DNS, and CVE/CPE queries.
-
io.github.aplaceforallmystuff/mcp-threatintel
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares cybersecurity, osint, security
Unified threat intel - OTX, AbuseIPDB, GreyNoise, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker
-
com.blackveilsecurity/dns
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares cybersecurity, email-security
DNS and email security scanner with 80 MCP tools for SPF, DMARC, DNSSEC, SSL, and brand audits.
-
app.reassign/reassign
— last commit 2026-07-25, shares mcpb
Reassign: a circular 24-hour calendar and time-tracking copilot with ADHD-friendly scheduling.
-
Proton Drive CLI MCP
— last commit 2026-06-12, shares mcpb
Manage Proton Drive from MCP clients through Proton's official CLI without exposing credentials.
-
io.github.dizzlkheinz/ynab-mcpb
— last commit 2026-07-29, shares mcpb
Local-first YNAB MCP for reconciliation, receipt splitting, safe cleanup, and spending analysis
-
DMARKOFF — DMARC, SPF & DKIM Analytics
— last commit 2026-04-30, shares email-security
DMARC analytics for AI assistants — domain health, SPF/DKIM records, compliance stats, anomalies.
-
dev.dnsdoctor/dns-doctor
— last commit 2026-08-04, shares email-security
Scan and fix email auth (SPF, DMARC, DKIM, MX, blacklists, expiry) + DNS checks. Validated fixes.
-
io.github.dmarc-examiner/mcp
— last commit 2026-08-04, shares email-security
Read your own DMARC aggregate and forensic reports: sources, alignment, alerts, CSV export.
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as ai-security, mitre-atlas, security, cve. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-agents, ai-security, api, claude, claude-desktop-extension, cve, cybersecurity, domain-recon, email-security, llm-tools, mcp, mcpb, mitre-atlas, mitre-d3fend, model-context-protocol, osint, security, sigma-rules, threat-intelligence, vulnerability-management.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab