mcp server
KDAN PDF
Upload, edit, compress, protect, redact, and compare PDFs with KDAN PDF in Claude and ChatGPT.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.0.0
- active
- document understanding
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-29. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 57 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-29 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 1 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 1.0.0 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-07-28 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-07-28 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
PDF Redaction MCP
— last commit 2026-07-20, shares pdf, pdf-redaction
MCP server for detecting and redacting PII (Personally Identifiable Information) in PDF documents.
-
DottedSign
— last commit 2026-06-10, shares ai-automation, workflow-automation
Automate eSignature workflows and signing tasks via natural language commands.
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-architecture-patterns
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
System and API design guidance covering component boundaries, data flow, integration patterns, and scalability consider…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-assimilate-popular-workflows
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SK…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-babysit-babysitter-issues
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "babysit issues", "work on assigned issues", "check a5c-agent issues",…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-catalog-babysitter-users
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
Discover public GitHub repositories that import defineTask from @a5c-ai/babysitter-sdk and maintain a deduplicated cata…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-code-generation
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
Minimal, pattern-matching code output. Write the least code that satisfies requirements. Match existing project pattern…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-code-review-patterns
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated repo…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-debugging-patterns
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
Root cause analysis frameworks including log-first investigation, git bisect correlation, and pattern-based diagnosis w…
-
a5c-ai-babysitter-fix-failing-pipelines
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-automation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "fix pipelines", "fix CI", "check staging pipelines", "fix failing work…
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as pdf, pdf-redaction, ai-automation, workflow-automation. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-automation, chatgpt, claude, connector, kdan, llm-tools, mcp, model-context-protocol, pdf, pdf-compare, pdf-compress, pdf-deletepages, pdf-password, pdf-reader, pdf-redaction, pdf-viewer, workflow-automation.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab