mcp server
LiveCheck AI
Secure MCP runtime server for scanning and autofixing code issues
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.0.2
- active
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-30.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 4 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-30 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 0 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 1.0.2 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-01-16 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-01-16 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
ai.packmind/mcp-server
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-code-governance
Packmind captures, scales, and enforces your organization's technical decisions.
-
ServiceNow MCP Server (NowAIKit)
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares servicenow
ServiceNow MCP server: 450+ tools for Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot & any AI. Read-only by default.
-
ServiceNow MCP Server
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares servicenow
400+ ServiceNow tools across all modules — ITSM, CMDB, HRSD, CSM, SecOps, and more.
-
Cejel
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-quality, code-review
Offline deterministic engineering-trust certificates for repositories, with no telemetry.
-
Verificate MCP
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares code-quality
Agentic code review, no signup to try: reality gates + frontier-model review, with veto.
-
Repowise
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-quality
Codebase intelligence for AI coding agents — graph, git history, docs, decisions, code health.
-
io.github.abhinavteja123/codemore
— last commit 2026-07-18, shares code-quality
The static analyzer your AI agent reads — fix-ready, machine-readable scan reports over MCP.
-
io.github.Alberto-Codes/docvet
— last commit 2026-08-04, shares code-quality
Docstring quality vetting for Python -- enrichment, freshness, coverage, and presence checks
-
io.github.blackwell-systems/agent-lsp
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-quality
Orchestrates language servers into 65 code-intelligence tools across 30 languages, token-optimized.
-
io.github.doazvjettu/leakguard-mcp
— last commit 2026-06-13, shares code-quality
Static analyzer flagging lookahead bias & data leakage in ML/trading code before backtest.
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as ai-code-governance, servicenow, code-quality, code-review. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-code-governance, code-quality, code-review, enterprise, governance, mcp, microsoft-dynamics-365, quality-clouds, salesforce, servicenow.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab