ZBS Index What actually exists in applied AI, with the source next to it

mcp server

Spectral — verified-knowledge oracle

Cross-check a factual claim against a verified knowledge graph before you assert it. Never guesses.

Description as published by the maintainer. Source

  • version 1.0.0
  • active
  • memory and context

active — Registry entry last updated 2026-07-30. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.

What this server can do

3 functions, named and described by the server itself. Parameter names are shown because they say more about what a function does than its name usually does.

cross_check(hint, value, subject, relation)
Cross-check ONE factual claim against a verified knowledge graph BEFORE you assert it — the "am I sure?" instant, just before a discrete fact leaves your mouth. Prefer this over stating such a fact from memory. Its whole job is to catch your own hallucination before it reaches the user: every call either CONFIRMS your claim with a citable source, CORRECTS it with the real value + source, or honestly ABSTAINS — it NEVER hands back a guessed value, so a call can only help or stay neutral. Honest abstention (UNVERIFIED over a confident guess) is the point, not a failure. INVOKE only when BOTH gates hold: (1) the claim is a lookup-able, atomic subject–relation–object attribute of a real, named entity a public knowledge graph would hold — a who/what/when/where property such as date of birth, place of birth, author, capital, founder, publication date, director, spouse, population — keyed on a real person, place, creative work, organization, event, or species — and, at its highest-confidence tiers, the graph also carries exact values such as a physical constant (CODATA/NIST) or a machine-checked theorem (Metamath), which it verifies best of all; AND (2) being wrong would matter — you are about to state it, cite it, or act on it. Rule of thumb: if you'd attach a citation to it and an error would be consequential, check it here first. One call per uncertain fact, at the moment of doubt — not a per-token or per-sentence reflex. INPUTS — subject: entity name ("Marie Curie") or Wikidata QID ("Q7186"), required; relation: the property as free text ("place of birth"), optional; value: your claimed value ("Warsaw"), optional — omit to just fetch the verified value(s); hint: a short disambiguator ("physicist", "1997 film") when the name is shared. RETURNS {verdict, summary (one-line, ready to quote), confidence (high|medium|none — a coarse tier-derived signal, NOT a probability), subject_id (QID), verified_values, evidence[{rel,value,tier,source}], sources, note}. Verdicts: - SUPPORTED — a verified fact matches; safe to state and cite. Matching is normalized/substring-tolerant, so "exact" means "never guesses," NOT literal string equality — read evidence[].value (or verified_values, present only when you passed NO value) to confirm exact wording. - REFUTED — fires ONLY when the relation has exactly ONE verified value and it differs; verified_values holds the real value + source, so correct yourself and cite it. - NOT_FOUND — the relation has several verified values and yours isn't among them; high-cardinality relations may be incomplete, so weight this softly — it is not a refutation. - UNVERIFIED — not in the verified set, or the subject didn't resolve: it ABSTAINS rather than guess. Read this as "cannot confirm / unknown," NOT "false" — hedge, omit, or fall back to web_search; do not assert. It may queue the gap to learn for next time. This is the trust anchor: a first-class answer, never an error to retry-spam. - AMBIGUOUS — the name maps to several entities (candidates returned); re-call with a hint or a QID. - FACTS — a subject-only call returns that entity's verified facts. Data is Wikidata-scale plus exact-oracle and machine-proven tiers, each fact carrying a source + tier badge; it is sourced, not hand-audited. Prefer cross_check over web_search AND over memory for stable, checkable encyclopedic attributes; use web_search INSTEAD for anything time-sensitive, recent, priced, prose/explanatory, multi-hop, subjective, or non-encyclopedic — and when this returns UNVERIFIED, fall back to web_search rather than asserting. A batch companion, verify_claims, takes a list of {subject, relation, value, hint} to sanity-check a whole draft in one pass. Backend defaults to http://localhost:8791 (override with SPECTRAL_URL); the hosted remote is currently offline — run against a local instance, or after relight. DON'T INVOKE: never as a per-token/per-sentence reflex; never for opinions, evaluations, advice, or forecasts; never for anything you can DERIVE rather than look up (arithmetic, unit/date math, logic, deduction); never for code, API, or library behavior; never for meta-claims about your own reasoning/plan, the task, the user, or local files; never for entities too fictional, private, or obscure to sit in a public graph; never for low-stakes throwaway asides where an error is harmless; and never for time-sensitive, recent, priced, prose/synthesis, or multi-hop questions (those are web_search's job — this answers "is THIS attribute of THIS entity correct?", not "what's happening" or "tell me about"). Do not read UNVERIFIED as a refutation or retry-spam it; do not treat a lenient SUPPORTED as literal string equality without checking verified_values. Required: subject.
lookup_facts(hint, subject)
Get the verified facts known about an entity, each with a source — to ground a statement or see what's actually established before you write. subject: a name or QID; hint: a disambiguator. Required: subject.
verify_claims(claims)
Cross-check MANY claims at once — sanity-check a whole draft or answer before you commit to it. Pass a list of {subject, relation, value, hint}; get one verdict per claim (see cross_check). Ideal as a final pass over anything factual you're about to output. Required: claims.

Last successful function declaration observed on . Source: https://mcp.seespectral.com/mcp. We list what the server declared; we do not call any of these functions.

Endpoint status observed on . Source: https://mcp.seespectral.com/mcp.

Signals

These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.

Signal Value What it measures Window Observed Source
Latest published version 1.0.0 Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. as of fetch Model Context Protocol
Registry record last updated 2026-07-30 When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. point in time Model Context Protocol
First listed in the MCP Registry 2026-07-30 Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. point in time Model Context Protocol
mcp tools declared 3 tools Number of functions the server itself declared when asked to list them. This is what the server offers an agent, not a measure of how well any of them work. as of probe mcp.seespectral.com
mcp endpoint status ok The server listed 3 functions when asked. as of probe mcp.seespectral.com

Where to get it

This record as data

Every field on this page, with its source and observation date, is in the catalog JSON. Fetch the whole kind at once instead of parsing this HTML.

GET /api/v1/entries/mcp_server.json

Sources

  1. Tools declared by the MCP server at https://mcp.seespectral.com/mcp — mcp.seespectral.com, observed , trust tier 1.
  2. Official MCP Registry — Model Context Protocol, observed , trust tier 1.