mcp server
Code Pathfinder
Code intelligence MCP server: call graphs, type inference, and symbol search for Python/Go.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 2.1.1
- active
- retrieval
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-10. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 140 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-10 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 37 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 2.1.1 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-04-26 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-04-26 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
Draugr
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-scanning, sast, security
Security scanning for AI agents: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, DAST, ranked by real risk.
-
io.github.abhinavteja123/codemore
— last commit 2026-07-18, shares sast, security, static-analysis
The static analyzer your AI agent reads — fix-ready, machine-readable scan reports over MCP.
-
Apiiro Guardian Agent
— last commit 2026-06-22, shares sast, security, security-tools
Apiiro Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) tools for AI coding assistants.
-
io.github.caglarbozkurt/heimdall
— last commit 2026-07-06, shares sast, security
Scan an MCP server or agent config for injection, exfiltration, and risky capabilities.
-
SkillsSafe Security Scanner
— last commit 2026-03-13, shares security-tools, static-analysis
AI skill security scanner. Detects prompt injection, credential theft, ClawHavoc. Free, no signup.
-
elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-apk-redteam-pipeline
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares application-security, security-tools
End-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx…
-
elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-bb-local-toolkit
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares application-security, security-tools
Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for T…
-
elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-bb-methodology
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares application-security, security-tools
Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next.…
-
elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-bug-bounty
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares application-security, security-tools
Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source c…
-
elementalsouls-claude-bughunter-bugcrowd-reporting
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares application-security, security-tools
Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exa…
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as code-scanning, sast, security, static-analysis. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-agents, ai-sast, application-security, code-scanning, mcp, mcp-server, sast, security, security-tools, static-analysis, static-code-analysis, structural-search.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab