mcp server
proof
Stamp content with permanent, verifiable provenance. Hash locally, verify free forever.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.0.0
- active
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-19.
What this server can do
The endpoint published in the registry did not answer (Error: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND proof.tatastu.dev). The listing points at a server that is not running.
Endpoint status observed on . Source: https://proof.tatastu.dev/mcp.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 0 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-19 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 1 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 1.0.0 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-07-08 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-07-08 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| mcp endpoint status | unreachable | The endpoint published in the registry did not answer (Error: getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND proof.tatastu.dev). The listing points at a server that is not running. | as of probe | proof.tatastu.dev |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
io.github.beeswaxpat/chronoverify
— last commit 2026-08-03, shares c2pa, content-authenticity, content-credentials
Verify a photo's capture time and provenance: C2PA validation, EXIF/XMP, and pixel forensics.
-
io.github.codex-curator/studiomcphub
— last commit 2026-05-14, shares arweave, provenance
32 creative AI tools (18 free) for agents: generate, upscale, mockup, print, watermark.
-
ActionProof
— last commit 2026-07-01, shares ed25519, provenance
Tamper-proof audit trail for AI agents. Signed receipts, offline-verifiable, zero backend.
-
io.github.HMAKT99/akf
— shares eu-ai-act, provenance
Trust metadata for AI agents — check files before building on them, stamp verified work.
-
io.github.Abracadabrastartup/deusproof-mcp
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares provenance
Prove your AI work existed first: timestamped, Bitcoin-anchored. Free, no account.
-
AnchorRegistry
— last commit 2026-06-13, shares provenance
On-chain provenance lookup for AnchorRegistry. Resolve AR-IDs, hashes, and full trees. Authless.
-
Nahuali
— last commit 2026-07-30, shares provenance
Trust-aware agent memory with evidence-backed recall, self-inspection, and audit history.
-
io.github.blackwell-systems/knowing
— last commit 2026-07-08, shares provenance
Content-addressed code graph with 22 MCP tools for AI agents.
-
io.github.chernistry/bernstein
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares provenance
Declarative agent orchestration for engineering teams
-
io.github.Christebob/meta-stamp-pockets
— last commit 2026-07-29, shares provenance
Attribution and settlement infrastructure for AI agent content access over HTTP 402 and MCP.
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as c2pa, content-authenticity, content-credentials, provenance. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-content, arweave, c2pa, content-authenticity, content-credentials, ed25519, eu-ai-act, mcp, proof-of-authorship, provenance.
This record as data
Every field on this page, with its source and observation date, is in the catalog JSON. Fetch the whole kind at once instead of parsing this HTML.
GET /api/v1/entries/mcp_server.json