mcp server
Open Investment Model
Read-only OpenIM search for institutional buy-side investment models and architecture.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 0.1.1
- active
- retrieval
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-22. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 3 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-22 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 0 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 0.1.1 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-07-22 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-07-22 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
OrangePro
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares knowledge-graph, ontology
Find test gaps, generate grounded tests, and dynamically prove behavior with mutation testing.
-
Aiqbee Brain
— last commit 2026-03-07, shares enterprise-architecture, knowledge-graph
AI knowledge graph for architecture, portfolio, and digital strategy management.
-
io.github.archradhq/deterministic
— last commit 2026-05-21, shares enterprise-architecture
Deterministic IR/IR-LINT validation, policy packs, drift vs exports (archrad). Apache-2.0.
-
io.github.cruxible-ai/cruxible-core
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares ontology
Deterministic decision engine with receipts. Define rules in YAML, query a graph, get proof.
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-autoresearch
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canon…
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-canvas
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Create, inspect, and update Obsidian JSON Canvas boards with text, file, link, group, and edge nodes. Use for canvas st…
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-defuddle
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Plan and, with explicit network consent, use an optional external Defuddle cleaner to extract article-like HTTPS pages…
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-example
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Hermetic contract-validation fixture.
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-obsidian-bases
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Explain, draft, and validate Obsidian Bases .base files with filters, formulas, properties, summaries, and table, card,…
-
agricidaniel-claude-obsidian-obsidian-markdown
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares knowledge-graph
Explain, draft, or validate Obsidian Flavored Markdown syntax: properties, wikilinks, embeds, callouts, tags, comments,…
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as knowledge-graph, ontology, enterprise-architecture. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-agents, asset-management, buy-side, canonical-data-model, enterprise-architecture, financial-services, institutional-investing, investment-management, knowledge-graph, ontology, reference-model.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab