mcp server
api-governance
API governance for AI agents. Detects breaking changes, scores blast radius, blocks unsafe calls.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.0.1
- active
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-16.
What this server can do
3 functions, named and described by the server itself. Parameter names are shown because they say more about what a function does than its name usually does.
get_decision_details(decision_id, fingerprint)- Retrieve a PAST CodeRifts decision by decision_id (or fingerprint): full report payload, breaking changes list, scores, and linked receipt metadata if stored. Use this when: - You have a decision_id (or fingerprint) from a previous preflight, PR comment, or CI log and need to inspect or explain that past decision. - You are auditing why a prior ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK was issued. - You are NOT requesting a new analysis of current before/after specs. Do not use when: - You need a decision for the CURRENT uncommitted or PR head change set — call coderifts.preflight_change_set with the current artifacts. - You hold a receipt token and only need cryptographic/lifecycle verification — use coderifts.verify_receipt. - You have no decision_id/fingerprint — run preflight first to create one. Inputs: at least one of decision_id (preferred) or fingerprint is required (empty {} is rejected by the server as INVALID_INPUT). Returns the stored decision document or not_found.
preflight_change_set(context, artifacts, preflight_mode, idempotency_key, previous_receipt, decision_spec_version)- Preflight a COMPLETE base→head change set of contract artifacts and return risk score and breaking-change analysis — plus, on the AUTHORIZE path only, a governance decision (ALLOW / WARN / REQUIRE_APPROVAL / BLOCK) and a signed chain-receipt when applicable. ANALYZE returns informational risk only: analysis_outcome, may_execute:false, no decision, no receipt. Requires a pending base→head (before/after) contract change you are about to act on (merge, deploy, publish, or register tools). No pending change set → do not call this tool. Use this when: - You are about to merge, push, deploy, publish, or register/expose agent tools, AND the change includes ≥1 contract artifact (OpenAPI/Swagger, GraphQL SDL, gRPC/protobuf, AsyncAPI, MCP manifest, or agent tool schemas: type=agent_tools, including before re-registering tools with a runtime). - You have (or can assemble) FULL base and head for every changed contract artifact in this set — not a single-file subset when other contract files also change. - You need a NEW decision for the CURRENT change; you do not already hold a currently-valid receipt for this exact target/operation. - You hold a receipt for a different operation or target than the act you will perform (e.g. ALLOW for merge, now deploying) — re-call with the intended operation; a differently-scoped receipt is not reusable authorization. Do not use when: - The change is documentation-only (README, guides, comments) with no contract artifact content change — do not call any CodeRifts tool. - You already hold a signed receipt and only need to check it is authentic and currently valid — use coderifts.verify_receipt instead. - You need details of a PREVIOUS decision by decision_id — use coderifts.get_decision_details instead. - You want a static 0–100 "agent readiness" score for one OpenAPI/MCP file and there is no pending base→head mutate — use coderifts.agent_readiness_score (advanced / opt-in; not one of the three default tools). If that tool is not in your available list, call none of the CodeRifts tools; do not substitute preflight_change_set. - You cannot supply both before and after (or base and head) for the artifacts that change — fix the change set first; do not invent empty before specs. Inputs: list of artifacts, each with type, before, after (or equivalent), plus optional operation (merge|deploy|tool_call|publish), environment/stakes, and context. Returns decision, execution_action, risk fields, and chain_receipt when issued. Mode (required): pass preflight_mode. Use "analyze" for informational risk only (returns analysis_outcome with may_execute:false, no decision/execution_action/ safe_for_agent, no receipt). Use "authorize" for the operation-bound path that can mint a receipt (requires context.operation: merge|deploy|publish|tool_call). Under Decision Spec 2.0 the mode is mandatory; omission is an error unless a legacy decision_spec_version "1.0" pin is set. Required: artifacts, preflight_mode.
verify_receipt(token, audience, operation, target_id, environment, fingerprint, decision_result)- Verify a CodeRifts signed chain-receipt you ALREADY HOLD: cryptographic authenticity (signature + key id), body binding, and — when lifecycle indices are available — whether it is currently valid authorization (not expired, superseded, or revoked) for a stated operation/target. Use this when: - You already obtained a chain_receipt / receipt token from a prior preflight (or CI artifact) and are about to act (merge/deploy) under that receipt. - A contract-gate or policy requires offline/online proof that the receipt is authentic for this change before proceeding. - You must distinguish "signature ok" from "currently authorized" (stale or superseded receipts must not be treated as live approval). Do not use when: - You do not have a receipt yet — call coderifts.preflight_change_set first. - You need a NEW decision for a changed base→head set — preflight again; verify_receipt does not re-diff specs. - The receipt you hold binds a different operation or target than the one you are about to perform — call coderifts.preflight_change_set for that operation; verify_receipt cannot re-scope or re-issue a decision. - You only need human-readable history of an old decision_id without a receipt token — use coderifts.get_decision_details. - The change set itself is unknown or incomplete — fix the change set and preflight; do not "verify" a placeholder. Inputs: receipt token (required); optional expected target_id, operation, and now-skew policy hooks. Returns { valid, status, currently_authorized (bool|null), reason, payload, authz_* }. Branch on currently_authorized; null = not evaluated. Required: token.
Last successful function declaration observed on . Source: https://app.coderifts.com/mcp. We list what the server declared; we do not call any of these functions.
Endpoint status observed on . Source: https://app.coderifts.com/mcp.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 0 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-16 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 0 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 1.0.1 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-06-15 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-06-15 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| mcp tools declared | 3 tools | Number of functions the server itself declared when asked to list them. This is what the server offers an agent, not a measure of how well any of them work. | as of probe | app.coderifts.com | |
| mcp endpoint status | ok | The server listed 3 functions when asked. | as of probe | app.coderifts.com |
Where to get it
This record as data
Every field on this page, with its source and observation date, is in the catalog JSON. Fetch the whole kind at once instead of parsing this HTML.
GET /api/v1/entries/mcp_server.json