mcp server
T1/T2 Protocol
Caller-side T1/T2 heterogeneous validation MCP server. Stdlib-only Python.
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 0.1.1
- active
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-06-16.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 0 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-06-16 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 0 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 0.1.1 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-06-16 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-06-16 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
Verificate MCP
— last commit 2026-08-05, shares llm-validation
Agentic code review, no signup to try: reality gates + frontier-model review, with veto.
-
ai.marchward/mcp-server
— last commit 2026-07-01, shares ai-safety
Runtime authority for AI agents: credential mediation, spend cap, approval gates, audit log.
-
ai.responsibleailabs/rail-score
— last commit 2026-06-22, shares ai-safety
Responsible-AI guardrails for agents: scoring with policy, injection & PII detection, DPDP.
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-brainstorming
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it takes…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-brainstorming-6e7b5a
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it takes…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-commit-gate
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
The only path to a commit. Routed to when the user invokes /commit or otherwise instructs codeArbiter to persist staged…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-commit-gate-f32571
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
The only path to a commit. Routed to when the user invokes /commit or otherwise instructs codeArbiter to persist staged…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-context-check
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
Optional manual drift audit — report stale provenance-tracked docs (via _provenancelib drift detection across .codearbi…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-context-check-becf68
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
Optional manual drift audit — report stale provenance-tracked docs (via _provenancelib drift detection across .codearbi…
-
arbiterforge-codearbiter-context-creation
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares ai-safety
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITI…
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as llm-validation, ai-safety. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai-agent, ai-safety, cross-validation, heterogeneous-validation, llm-validation, mcp, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, python, stdlib, structured-reasoning.
This record as data
Every field on this page, with its source and observation date, is in the catalog JSON. Fetch the whole kind at once instead of parsing this HTML.
GET /api/v1/entries/mcp_server.json