mcp server
com.md-log/md-log-mcp
md-log MCP: save/update/fetch markdown by path (stdio + remote HTTP, PAT auth).
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 1.1.4
- active
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-07-27.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 3 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-07-27 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 0 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Package downloads | 136 downloads | Package downloads from the npm registry in this window. Includes continuous integration runs, mirrors and automated installs, so it overstates the number of human users. | 2026-07-30 to 2026-08-05 | npm | |
| Latest published version | 1.1.4 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-07-27 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-07-27 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
io.github.bickov/slimsnap
— last commit 2026-07-30, shares annotation
Your recent screen captures as structured JSON your AI agent can read. Local only, no network.
-
chat.mumo/mcp
— last commit 2026-07-10, shares code-review
Consult a multi-model panel on contested decisions via MCP: architecture, plan review, strategy.
-
com.get-obra/obra-cto
— last commit 2026-07-04, shares code-review
Local-first MCP that scores your codebase's build readiness. Your code never leaves your machine.
-
LiveCheck AI
— last commit 2026-07-30, shares code-review
Secure MCP runtime server for scanning and autofixing code issues
-
ControlKeel
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Governed MCP workflows with policy validation, findings tracking, and review gates.
-
io.github.aryamthecodebreaker/fixmap
— last commit 2026-08-04, shares code-review
Deterministic local-first repo context for coding agents with one-command GitHub issue analysis.
-
io.github.asklokesh/loki-mode
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 34 tools over stdio.
-
Cejel
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Offline deterministic engineering-trust certificates for repositories, with no telemetry.
-
Unwritten
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares code-review
Catches files and C# members you forgot to change, learned from your repo's git history
-
io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy
— archived, last commit 2026-06-02, shares code-review
MCP server that helps AI coding agents interact with AI code reviewers on GitHub PRs
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as annotation, code-review. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: ai, annotation, claude, claude-code, code-review, codex, cursor, developer-tools, documentation, human-in-the-loop, llm, markdown, mcp, model-context-protocol, vibe-coding.
Bring your own setup
We take apart real AI setups every week and show what broke, what cost too much, and what the trace actually said. If you run agents on real work, that is where the useful conversation is.
Join ZBS AI Practice Lab