mcp server
ejentum-mcp
Reasoning, code, anti-deception, memory harness MCP tools. Stdio or HTTPS api.ejentum.com/mcp
Description as published by the maintainer. Source
- version 0.2.2
- active
- memory and context
active — Most recent push to the repository was 2026-06-11. Dashed tags are derived by ZBS Index from the published description, not stated by the maintainer.
What this server can do
The server requires authentication before it will list its tools (HTTP 401). We do not hold an account for it, so its functions are unknown to us.
Endpoint status observed on . Source: https://api.ejentum.com/mcp.
Signals
These are separate measurements of different things. They are deliberately not combined into one score, because a popularity number that mixes website traffic with saves and stars cannot be checked or acted on.
| Signal | Value | What it measures | Window | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 13 | Number of GitHub accounts that bookmarked this repository since it was created. It is a bookmark count, not installs, not active users and not quality. | cumulative, all time | GitHub | |
| Last commit | 2026-06-11 | Date of the most recent push to any branch. This is the strongest cheap indicator of whether the project is still maintained. | point in time | GitHub | |
| Open issues | 1 | Open issues plus open pull requests, as GitHub counts them together. A high number can mean an active project or an abandoned one. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| Latest published version | 0.2.2 | Latest version string the maintainer published to the registry. | as of fetch | Model Context Protocol | |
| Registry record last updated | 2026-06-11 | When the registry record was last updated by its maintainer. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| License | MIT | Licence GitHub detected in the repository. Detection can be wrong; the LICENSE file is authoritative. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| First listed in the MCP Registry | 2026-06-11 | Date this server was first published to the official MCP Registry. Not a usage or quality measure. | point in time | Model Context Protocol | |
| repository status | active | The repository exists on GitHub and is not archived. This says nothing about how recently it was worked on. | as of fetch | GitHub | |
| mcp endpoint status | auth_required | The server requires authentication before it will list its tools (HTTP 401). We do not hold an account for it, so its functions are unknown to us. | as of probe | api.ejentum.com |
Where to get it
Related, by what their authors tagged them
-
io.github.ejentum/self-inspect-mcp
— last commit 2026-06-13, shares agentic-ai, ejentum
Send a thought, get one metathought that makes your agent inspect its own assumptions. Keyless.
-
chat.mumo/mcp
— last commit 2026-07-10, shares code-review
Consult a multi-model panel on contested decisions via MCP: architecture, plan review, strategy.
-
com.get-obra/obra-cto
— last commit 2026-07-04, shares code-review
Local-first MCP that scores your codebase's build readiness. Your code never leaves your machine.
-
com.md-log/md-log-mcp
— last commit 2026-07-27, shares code-review
md-log MCP: save/update/fetch markdown by path (stdio + remote HTTP, PAT auth).
-
LiveCheck AI
— last commit 2026-07-30, shares code-review
Secure MCP runtime server for scanning and autofixing code issues
-
ControlKeel
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Governed MCP workflows with policy validation, findings tracking, and review gates.
-
io.github.aryamthecodebreaker/fixmap
— last commit 2026-08-04, shares code-review
Deterministic local-first repo context for coding agents with one-command GitHub issue analysis.
-
io.github.asklokesh/loki-mode
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI with an MCP server exposing 34 tools over stdio.
-
Cejel
— last commit 2026-08-06, shares code-review
Offline deterministic engineering-trust certificates for repositories, with no telemetry.
-
Unwritten
— last commit 2026-08-01, shares code-review
Catches files and C# members you forgot to change, learned from your repo's git history
These share tags the maintainers applied themselves, such as agentic-ai, ejentum, code-review. Common tags like "mcp" or "ai" are ignored for this: agreeing with six hundred other projects is not a similarity.
This is not a recommendation and not a test result. It is a map of what the authors said their work is about.
How the author describes it
Topics the maintainer set on GitHub: agentic-ai, ai-reliability, anthropic, anti-deception, claude, code-review, cognitive-scaffold, ejentum, llm-tools, mcp, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, reasoning-harness, typescript.
This record as data
Every field on this page, with its source and observation date, is in the catalog JSON. Fetch the whole kind at once instead of parsing this HTML.
GET /api/v1/entries/mcp_server.json